Sunday, 9 December 2012

Camelia – Elena Grecu


     As Ms Cercel followed legal procedures and requested that the decision taken in file 3759/P/2012 gets struck out because it is illicit, Ms Carmen Elena Grecu exposes the victims to even more aggravated humiliating behaviour, as on 23 November she ignores the ongoing case 1036/P/2012 and sends the complaint to be dealt with by the person she is investigating – Mr Marius Chirila – for criminal offences.


EVIDENCE:

Camelia Elena Grecu


   On 15 November 2012, further to several refusals to phone information over the ongoing case 1036/P/2012, Ms Cercel attends an appointment with Ms Carmen Elena Grecu.

    During the appointment, Ms Camelia Elena Grecu “promises” she will be following legal procedures, yet you will shortly see that that was a lie.


EVIDENCE:

Camelia Elena Grecu


    Further to the escalation from 10 November, ignoring the fact that she is now investigating a criminal case against Mr Marius Chirila, Ms Carmen Elena Grecu emails the victims and relates she has sent their complaint to be dealt with by Mr Marius Chirila – prosecutor who is already investigated by her.


EVIDENCE :


Mr Cercel, however replies, pointing out obvious human rights infringements.



EVIDENCE:



Carmen-Elena Grecu


    As on 10 November 2012, Mr Cercel received “confirmation” that Ms Georgiana Glavan will not be starting a criminal prosecution against the trespassers because “the dogs of the family prevented” them from probably watching TV in the victims bedroom, but she will not be starting criminal prosecution against Ms Cercel as her dogs have bitten the trespassers when they breached the property, and how the decision is signed by Mr Marius Chirila against whom there is an ongoing criminal prosecution, Mr Cercel emails and escalated the matter with Ms Carmen Elena Grecu.

EVIDENCE:


Camelia Elena Grecu


   On 1st November 2012, the day after the recording of the criminal case 1036/P/2012, Mr Cercel emails Ms Carmen Elena Grecu to supply with “beyond any doubt” evidence against the case offenders.


EVIDENCE:





Camelia Elena Grecu


    On 31st October 2012, Ms Carmen Elena Grecu records a criminal investigation against Mr Marius Chirila, Mr Temucin Chespin and Mr Braik Marian for protecting criminal offenders and delaying prosecution, case number 1036/P/2012.


   From this day on, in 20 days, the above three should be arrested. You will see in a later post that this did not happened.


EVIDENCE:

AVP – Romanian Ombudsman vs Agent Braik Marian Prim Procuror Chirila Marius

   As it is obvious that nobody – no legal body – cares for their human rights and having exhausted the internal procedures of the two bodies that are discriminating him, Mr Cercel contacts the Romanian Ombudsman on 31st October 2012.



EVIDENCE:

 

Dna Procuror Glavan Georgiana Dl Prim-Procuror Marius Chirila Dna Procuror General Camelia-Elena Grecu

   In an attempt to provide with “beyond any doubt” evidence to have an adequate criminal prosecution against the offenders, Mr Cercel emails the above three prosecutors on 29 October 2012 with the evidences (in various readable formats) and a more detailed statement.


EVIDENCE:







Glavan Georgiana


    As the criminal prosecution against Mr Dumitru Sibisanu reached Medgidia's Prosecutor's Office with the reference number 3579/P/2012, on 26 October 2012, Mr Cercel contacts the above prosecutor via telephone to enquire about the state of the proceedings.


EVIDENCE:
phone call0040241814043 outgoing 10-26  07.00.45


   As Ms Georgiana Glavan tries to provide false information during the phone call, Mr Cercel emails her.

FURTHER EVIDENCE:




Elena Camelia Grecu


   On 24 October 2012, using the response from Mr Burlacu Valentin, response that confirms that Mr Marius Chirila is perverting justice and delaying in taking actions, Mr Cercel email Ms Carmen Elena Grecu.


EVIDENCE: