Camelia – Elena Grecu

     As Ms Cercel followed legal procedures and requested that the decision taken in file 3759/P/2012 gets struck out because it is illicit, Ms Carmen Elena Grecu exposes the victims to even more aggravated humiliating behaviour, as on 23 November she ignores the ongoing case 1036/P/2012 and sends the complaint to be dealt with by the person she is investigating – Mr Marius Chirila – for criminal offences.

EVIDENCE:

Camelia Elena Grecu

   On 15 November 2012, further to several refusals to phone information over the ongoing case 1036/P/2012, Ms Cercel attends an appointment with Ms Carmen Elena Grecu.

    During the appointment, Ms Camelia Elena Grecu “promises” she will be following legal procedures, yet you will shortly see that that was a lie.

EVIDENCE:

Camelia Elena Grecu

    Further to the escalation from 10 November, ignoring the fact that she is now investigating a criminal case against Mr Marius Chirila, Ms Carmen Elena Grecu emails the victims and relates she has sent their complaint to be dealt with by Mr Marius Chirila – prosecutor who is already investigated by her.

EVIDENCE :

Mr Cercel, however replies, pointing out obvious human rights infringements.

EVIDENCE:

Carmen-Elena Grecu

    As on 10 November 2012, Mr Cercel received “confirmation” that Ms Georgiana Glavan will not be starting a criminal prosecution against the trespassers because “the dogs of the family prevented” them from probably watching TV in the victims bedroom, but she will not be starting criminal prosecution against Ms Cercel as her dogs have bitten the trespassers when they breached the property, and how the decision is signed by Mr Marius Chirila against whom there is an ongoing criminal prosecution, Mr Cercel emails and escalated the matter with Ms Carmen Elena Grecu.

EVIDENCE:

Camelia Elena Grecu

   On 1^st November 2012, the day after the recording of the criminal case 1036/P/2012, Mr Cercel emails Ms Carmen Elena Grecu to supply with “beyond any doubt” evidence against the case offenders.

EVIDENCE:

Camelia Elena Grecu

    On 31^st October 2012, Ms Carmen Elena Grecu records a criminal investigation against Mr Marius Chirila, Mr Temucin Chespin and Mr Braik Marian for protecting criminal offenders and delaying prosecution, case number 1036/P/2012.

   From this day on, in 20 days, the above three should be arrested. You will see in a later post that this did not happened.

EVIDENCE:

AVP – Romanian Ombudsman vs Agent Braik Marian Prim Procuror Chirila Marius

   As it is obvious that nobody – no legal body – cares for their human rights and having exhausted the internal procedures of the two bodies that are discriminating him, Mr Cercel contacts the Romanian Ombudsman on 31^st October 2012.

EVIDENCE:

 

Dna Procuror Glavan Georgiana Dl Prim-Procuror Marius Chirila Dna Procuror General Camelia-Elena Grecu

   In an attempt to provide with “beyond any doubt” evidence to have an adequate criminal prosecution against the offenders, Mr Cercel emails the above three prosecutors on 29 October 2012 with the evidences (in various readable formats) and a more detailed statement.

EVIDENCE:

Glavan Georgiana

    As the criminal prosecution against Mr Dumitru Sibisanu reached Medgidia's Prosecutor's Office with the reference number 3579/P/2012, on 26 October 2012, Mr Cercel contacts the above prosecutor via telephone to enquire about the state of the proceedings.

EVIDENCE:

phone call0040241814043 outgoing 10-26  07.00.45

   As Ms Georgiana Glavan tries to provide false information during the phone call, Mr Cercel emails her.

FURTHER EVIDENCE:

Elena Camelia Grecu

   On 24 October 2012, using the response from Mr Burlacu Valentin, response that confirms that Mr Marius Chirila is perverting justice and delaying in taking actions, Mr Cercel email Ms Carmen Elena Grecu.

EVIDENCE:

Burlacu Valentin

   On 19 October 2012, Mr Burlacu Valentin replies to the complaint and request for evidence (copies of the phone calls) Mr Cercel made.

EVIDENCE:

His answer covers only parts of the issues raised by Mr Cercel and ignores his request for copies of the phone calls, and on this reason, on 24 October Mr Cercel emails back:

EVIDENCE:

Camelia-Elena Grecu

   On 20 October 2012, Mr Cercel emails and updates the Chief Attorney Camelia – Elena Grecu of recent events, events that should result in her subordinate, Prosecutor Marius Chirila arresting the offenders, offenders who on 18 October threatened the victims of trespassing once again and this time killing the victims.

EVIDENCE:

Request of evidence – Carmen Elena Grecu and Ion Pantilie

    On 9^th of October, Mr Cercel contacts both the Chief Constable Mr Ion Pantilie and Ms Carmen Elena Grecurequesting evidence, the phone calls that will easily highlight the premeditation of trespassing.

Yest, as you will see at a later stage, their request was never processed.

EVIDENCE:

 

General Attorney Elena Carmen Grecu

   On the same day, 9 October, as he received the reply to his complaint, Mr Cercel writes a further complaint.

EVIDENCE:

General Attorney Carmen Elena Grecu

   On 9^th of October, Ms Carmen Elena Grecu emails our Mr Cercel her reply to his official complaint.

EVIDENCE:

Camelia Elena Grecu and Petre Toba

   On 3^rd October, further to the request that complaint be sent in Romanian, Mr Cercel emails back the two Chief Executives with a translated version of the complaint in Romanian.

EVIDENCE:

 

Camelia Elena Grecu

On 2^nd October 2012, Ms Camelia Elena Grecu – General Prosecutor at Constanta`s Court of Appeal Prosecutors Office emails replies via email, asking for the complaint to be sent in Romanian.

EVIDENCE:

Petre Toba and Camelia-Elena Grecu

   On 26 September 2012, members of the Cercel family write an official complaint letter to the Chiefs Executives of the Romanian Police and Constanta`s Court of Appeal Prosecutors Office : Mr Petre Toba and Ms Camelia-Elena Grecu.

EVIDENCE:

Medgidia Prosecutor Office

  On 17 September, Ms Cercel emails Mr Marius Chirila and informs him of ongoing criminal offences her family is subject of at the hands of the well known brawler Mr Dumitru Sibisanu.

EVIDENCE:

attachment

Constanta County Police Inspectorate

   Friday, 14^th September, the Cercel family calls the above police inspectorate, and during the phone conversation with Commissioner Pandea, they were confirmed that if at this stage Mr Marian Braik is still investigating a complaint dated 24 July it is a clear case of a long and unexplained delay in following procedures and we should contact the case prosecutor – Mr Marius Chirila to notify him.